Newstral
Article
LA Times on 2016-11-02 13:00
Legal or not, L.A. developers should not get special breaks from city officials
Related news
- L.A. homeless crisis challenges developersfinance-commerce.com
- L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti has yet to ban private meetings with developersLA Times
- L.A. Council Committee Approves Fee on Developersegpnews.com
- L.A. Approves Fee on Developers for Parksegpnews.com
- L.A. developers grapple with affordable-housing measure passed by a wide marginLA Times
- L.A. politicians propose banning campaign contributions from developersLA Times
- L.A. narrows list of developers for upcoming homeless-housing projectsLA Times
- Tax breaks lead to more L.A. filmingnews-gazette.com
- Ballot proposal would require L.A. developers to provide affordable housingLA Times
- L.A. could curb campaign donations from real estate developersLA Times
- Responding to Trump, L.A. proposes $10-million legal defense fund for immigrants facing deportationLA Times
- Heat not a factor so far in 33rd L.A. MarathonLA Times
- L.A. shops would get voice, not veto, in sidewalk vendingLA Times
- L.A. needs housing for the homeless, not new luxury apartmentsLA Times
- L.A. Renames Rodeo Road (Not Rodeo Drive) 'Barack Obama Boulevard'breitbart.com
- L.A.'s grassy parkways should not be parking spacesLA Times
- L.A.'s legal defense fund for immigrants will only embolden Trump supportersLA Times
- Double pay for not working — how is this acceptable to L.A.'s leaders?LA Times
- Under new system, L.A. developers can pay a fee rather than plant new treesLA Times
- Once again, we're reminded that developers and their checkbooks control L.A. City HallLA Times