Newstral
Article
WMUR 9 on 2017-12-08 18:41
Are 3-D mammograms really better? US puts scans to the test
Related news
- Are 3-D mammograms really better? US puts scans to the testWLWT News 5
- Are 3-D Mammograms Really Better? US Puts Scans to the Testmemphisdailynews.com
- Are 3-D mammograms really better? U.S. puts scans to the testDenver Post
- A better mammogram? Huge study putting 3-D scans to the testChicago Tribune
- Doctors to recruit 165,000 women to study if 3-D mammograms can spot deadly cancer better than X-raysThe Japan Times
- Are 3-D mammograms really better?timesrecord.com
- Are 3-D mammograms better than standard imaging? A diverse study aims to find outLA Times
- Are 3D mammograms better than standard imaging? A diverse study aims to find outDenver Post
- New 3-D screenings offer better breast scansWCPO
- Should there really be a cut-off age for mammograms?CNN
- Mammograms good at 40 but even better at 50, advisory group sayskansascity.com
- Breast cancer study to compare standard to 3D mammogramsjournalrecord.com
- 3-D mammograms more likely to detect breast cancerEverett Herald
- More isn't better when it comes to mammogramsLA Times
- As 3-D mammograms increase, here’s what to knowThe Columbian
- Wichita’s Cypress Imaging now offering 3-D mammogramsThe Wichita Eagle