DeutschNewstral
Article
cleveland.com on 2018-02-06 20:26
Supreme Court erred in FirstEnergy refund case says Consumers' Counsel
Related news
- Consumers’ Counsel and NOPEC negotiate additional reductions in FirstEnergy consumer billscleveland.com
High court: State's FirstEnergy refund order was improperThe Toledo Blade- Ohio Consumers' Counsel seeks testimony from PUCO advisor in FirstEnergy investigationThe Toledo Blade
FirstEnergy agrees to $306M refund to Ohio customersSeattle Times- Ohio Consumers' Counsel to FERC: lower utility rates to mirror corporate tax cutcleveland.com
Supreme Court reverses PUCO ruling ordering FirstEnergy to refund $43M to customersbizjournals.com- PUCO reverses disputed FirstEnergy charge; but customers won’t really get a refund.cleveland.com
- FirstEnergy Solutions lawsuit asks Ohio Supreme Court to block House Bill 6 referendumcleveland.com
- $43M in FirstEnergy overcharges can't be refunded: top courtcleveland.com
- FirstEnergy exec calls for ‘urgent’ aidThe Toledo Blade
- Consumers’ lawyer seeks refunds as FirstEnergy ratings fallSeattle Times
- Ohio Consumers’ Counsel blasts PUCO decision to push back NOPEC case, saying delay could increase electric billscleveland.com
- FirstEnergy rates lower, expect to save 80 cents a monthcleveland.com
- FirstEnergy made money in 2018 after cutting ties with bankrupt FirstEnergy Solutionscleveland.com
Ohio Supreme Court: Cleveland doesn’t have to refund millions in traffic-camera ticketsThe Plain Dealer- BCedar Fair customers aren't owed refund for 2020 COVID-19 closure, Ohio Supreme Court saysbeaconjournal.com
- Ohio Supreme Court to decide whether Cleveland must refund $4.1 million in traffic camera ticketscleveland.com
- Ohio Supreme Court nixes FirstEnergy electric grid chargecleveland.com
- BFirstEnergy must refund customers for improper lobbying costs, federal audit findsbeaconjournal.com
- FirstEnergy can't be allowed to pocket corporate-tax-cut windfall and short customers: editorialcleveland.com