Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2022-08-04 17:24
First District Holds LA’s Water Allocations To Agricultural Lessees Were Authorized Under Existing Leases And Did Not Constitute Or Implement A Separate “Project” Subject to CEQA Review
Related news
- California Court of Appeal Agrees Two Activities Constitute One CEQA Projectjdsupra.com
- CEQA Review Not Required for Water Allocations That Were Part of Earlier Projectjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Holds Addendum Process Authorized By CEQA, No New Findings Requiredjdsupra.com
- Residents’ Comments About Existing Fire Hazards Do Not Constitute Substantial Evidence of a New Project’s Impacts Under CEQAjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Holds City Violated CEQA By Refusing To Recognize Exemption For Single Family Residence Project And Attempting To Subject Owner’s Already Authorized And Completed Demolition Action To Retroactive Environmental Review (Yet Absolves City From Liability For Regulatory Taking)jdsupra.com
- A CEQA Trustee Agency “Muscles Up”: Third District Holds Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Newly Exercised Power To Require Notice Of And Regulate Substantial Water Diversions – Even Absent Streambed Alteration – Was Always Unambiguously Authorized By Fish & Game Code Section 1602jdsupra.com
- Abuses of CEQA continue to mount. The time for CEQA reform is now.ocregister.com
- Spring CEQA Roundup – 2020jdsupra.com
- CalEnviroScreen 3.0 – Still the Wrong Tool for CEQA Reviewjdsupra.com
- Recap of 2023 CEQA Amendments Now In Effectjdsupra.com
- CEQA Roundup – Recent Developmentsjdsupra.com
- CEQA Roundup – February 2019jdsupra.com
- 2020 CEQA Legislative Developmentsjdsupra.com
- CEQA 2023 Legislative Updatejdsupra.com
- 2022 CEQA Legislative Recapjdsupra.com
- Decision favors LA’s homelessnwaonline.com
- CEQA Meets RICO: Round Twojdsupra.com
- Discovering LA’s Chinatowndailytrojan.com
- LA’s most dangerous streetsnews.com.au