Newstral
Article
reviewtimes.com on 2015-09-24 16:38
Court Orders Anti-fracking Issue Back On Youngstown Ballot
Related news
- Court orders anti-fracking issue back on Youngstown ballotThe Crescent-News
- Youngstown council puts anti-fracking amendment on November ballotThe Vindicator
- BREAKING NEWS | Ohio Supreme Court orders Youngstown fracking amendment put back on ballotThe Vindicator
- Anti-fracking amendment won't be on May ballotThe Vindicator
- Group seeks to keep anti-fracking item off ballotThe Vindicator
- Ohio Supreme Court orders new ballot language for marijuana issueDaily Jeffersonian
- Court orders new ballot language for pot issueRecord-Courir
- Supreme Court orders state to fix wording of ballot issueThe Toledo Blade
- It's official: Anti-fracking amendment for Youngstown was defeated in NovemberThe Vindicator
- Groups argue Jon Husted shouldn’t have invalidated anti-fracking ballot issuemedinagazette.northcoastnow.com
- Mahoning commissioners hire outside law firm in ballot fight on anti-fracking amendmentThe Vindicator
- City files suit to force anti-fracking amendment to Nov. 3 ballotThe Vindicator
- Youngstown council guts anti-loitering law, review charter ballot proposalsThe Vindicator
- Wyoming watching Colorado’s anti-fracking ballot issueMerced Sun-Star
- Youngstown council forwards fracking-ban initiative to election boardThe Vindicator
- Anti-fracking advocates to announce another ballot effort MondayThe Vindicator
- Coalition urges Youngstown voters to reject the anti-fracking Community Bill of RightsThe Vindicator
- State Supreme Court Imposes Strict Limitations on Secretary of State’s Authority to Block Anti-Fracking Ballot Measures, Granting Oil and Gas Interests a Limited Victoryjdsupra.com