Newstral
Article
seattletimes.com on 2015-09-28 01:04
The Times recommends: Seattle voters should reject campaign-finance reform measure, Initiative 122
Related news
- TAsk Supporters of Initiative 122 Questions Todaythestranger.com
- The Times recommends: Reject Seattle Propositions 1A and 1BSeattle Times
- The Times recommends: Reject car tabs Initiative 976 and its devastating effectsSeattle Times
- The Times recommends: Reject $930M ‘Move Seattle’ transportation levyseattletimes.com
- The Times recommends: Reject I-135 for social housingseattletimes.com
- Big money behind Initiative 122 contradicts its purposeseattletimes.com
- Initiative 122 would bring power back to the peopleseattletimes.com
- The Seattle Times recommends: No on Initiative 1631Seattle Times
- ‘Social housing’ measure Initiative 135 in hands of Seattle votersseattletimes.com
- Initiative for first US carbon tax trails, gun measure leadsStar Telegram
- The Times recommends: Vote no on Seattle Initiative 135 for ‘social housing’seattletimes.com
- Honest Elections Seattle, Initiative-122, submits 32K+ signatures to City Clerkballardnewstribune.com
- Podcast: Opponent of I-1000 says voters should reject affirmative-action measureSeattle Times
- Campaign-finance reform: I-122 is timelyseattletimes.com
- Initiative 135, Seattle ‘social housing’ ballot measure, leads on election nightseattletimes.com
- Washington state voters reject carbon-fee initiativeSeattle Times
- Editorial: Oakland public campaign finance Measure W worth tryingSan Jose Mercury News
- The Times recommends: Vote yes on gun Initiative 1639Seattle Times