Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2016-04-06 18:15
Supreme Court Refuses to Review $188M Class Action Verdict Against Wal-Mart Based Upon “Trial by Formula”
Related news
- Wal-Mart example could cost stores $4Btriblive.com
- Wal-Mart to high court: Nix Pa. wage casePhilly.com
- Most Wal-Mart workers to get raises next monthtriblive.com
- Justices reject Wal-Mart, Wells Fargo class-action appealsdothaneagle.com
- Wal-Mart suppliers challengedThe Toledo Blade
- No Ohio or Pa. stores on Wal-Mart closing listThe Vindicator
- Wal-Mart to cut hours at several all-night supercenterstriblive.com
- Wal-Mart notebooknwaonline.com
- Wal-Mart profit down 8.2%nwaonline.com
- Wal-Mart shooting under reviewThe Crescent-News
- Wal-Mart sales, profit climbnwaonline.com
- Wal-Mart Shuffles Merchandising Teamwsj.com
- Wal-Mart lifts year's outlooknwaonline.com
- Amazon's value passes Wal-Marttimes-gazette.com
- Wal-Mart tests skills initiativeArkansas Online
- Wal-Mart cutting 7,000 jobsbizjournals.com
- Wal-Mart introduces curbside pickupThe Toledo Blade
- Wal-Mart using holiday helpersnwaonline.com