DeutschNewstral
Article
Washington Post on 2016-05-18 22:23
Why refugees should be seen as an investment, not a burden
Related news
Refugees should be seen as an investment, not a burdenSydney Morning Herald
The West should share burden of Afghan refugees, Iran saystehrantimes.com
Why We Should Take More Syrian RefugeesPine Bluff Commercial
Column: Refugees should not be political fodderlasvegassun.com
Welcoming Refugees Should Be a Settled QuestionThe New York Times- DWhy America Should Do Right by Refugeesdailynexus.com
Why Trump Should Take South African Refugeesinfowars.com
Israel to UN: Uprooted Jews should be seen as refugeesThe Findlay Courier- HIsrael to U.N.: Uprooted Jews Should be Seen as Refugeeshamodia.com
[Interview] David Miliband: EU should take over 500,000 refugeeseuobserver.com
Europe should consult its refugeesAl Jazeera
Refugees should run their affairsmonitor.co.ug
Ex-Marine Explains Why Refugees Should Be Welcome In Americahuffingtonpost.com- TIf Australia doesn't want those refugees, why should U.S.?torontosun.com
Why we should offer a safe haven for Syrian refugeesbizjournals.com
Why Canberra businesses should consider taking on refugees as apprenticesCanberra Times- HThe U.N. Should Give Refugees Passportshamodia.com
- Why savers should look to China for long-term investmentSydney Morning Herald