Article

jdsupra.com on 2017-01-24 19:35

New U.S. Federal Law Prohibits Contracts With “Anti-Yelping” Provisions

Late last year, President Obama signed into law the Consumer Review Fairness Act (“CRFA”). Intended to protect individuals who write unflattering ...

Hogan Lovells

Related news

New Jersey Prohibits Particular Waiver and Non-Disclosure Provisions in Employee Contracts and Settlement Agreements jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , The Settlement , New Jersey
Alert: New Federal Law Prohibits Non-Disparagement Provisions in Form Contracts jdsupra.com
New California Limits on Choice-of-Law and Venue Provisions in Employment Contracts, Including Arbitration Agreements, with Employees Primarily Residing and Working in California jdsupra.com
California , New California
New Virginia Law Prohibits “Pay-When-Paid” and “Pay-If-Paid” Provisions in Construction Contracts jdsupra.com
New Virginia
Federal Contracts and the Governing Provisions not always Provided for in the Contract jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
NC Legislature Decides To Legislate Choice Of Law Provisions In "Business Contracts"jdsupra.com
California , Illinois , New York , Delaware , Overland Park
The new DIFC Employment Law – key provisions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California Prohibits Out-of-State Venue and Choice-of-Law Provisions in Employee Agreements jdsupra.com
California
Last Week in the Federal Circuit (April 26-30): The Potentially Limited Life Of IP Assignment Provisions In Employment Contracts jdsupra.com
California , Axle
U.S. Department of Justice Sues North Carolina Hospital System for Insisting on Anti-Steering Provisions in Insurance Reimbursement Contracts jdsupra.com
Sherman , North Carolina , Michigan , United States
California Prohibits Most “No Rehire” Provisions in Settlement Agreements jdsupra.com
United States , Switzerland , The Settlement , California
9th Circuit: Core Provisions of California’s AB 51 Are Not Preempted by Federal Law jdsupra.com
California
DOJ and North Carolina Challenge Anti-Steering and Tiering Provisions in Managed Care Contracts jdsupra.com
Sherman , North Carolina
California Prohibits “No Rehire” Provisions In Settlement Agreements jdsupra.com
United States , Switzerland , The Settlement , California
Comparative analysis of the provisions of Federal Law No. 214-FZ in light of recent amendments jdsupra.com
Maine Delays Effective Date of Anti-Discrimination Provisions of Recreational Marijuana Law jdsupra.com
United States , Maine
North Dakota Amends Certain Financial Services Law and Licensing Provisions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , North Dakota
Interpreting Indemnity Provisions in Construction Contracts jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Construction contracts: ambiguities in remeasurement provisions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
California prohibits employee agreements providing for out-of-state venue or law jdsupra.com
New California , California