Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2017-06-20 23:57
Supreme Court Holds THE SLANTS Can Be Registered as a Trademark: Disparagement Clause Violates the First Amendment
Related news
- Supreme Court: The Slants Keep Their Name – “Disparagement” Clause Violates The First Amendmentjdsupra.com
- Trademark Newsflash: Supreme Court Strikes Down Disparagement Clausejdsupra.com
- SCOTUS: Supreme Court Holds Disparagement Clause of the Lanham Act Violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendmentjdsupra.com
- Trademark This, Said The Slantswsj.com
- Band Trademark Can Rock On: Lanham Act Disparagement Clause Unconstitutionaljdsupra.com
- Matal v. Tam: Trademark Disparagement Clause Held Unconstitutionaljdsupra.com
- Of Slants, Skins, And Signs: Section 2(a) Prohibition of Disparaging Trademark Registrations Struck Down!jdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Finds Lanham Act Disparagement Clause Unconstitutional Under First Amendmentjdsupra.com
- Why the Supreme Court gutted the Lanham Act’s disparagement clausethedailyrecord.com
- Asian American band the Slants takes its trademark battle to the Supreme Court: Is it free speech or a racial slur?LA Times
- 'It's a lot bigger than the band': The Slants challenge ruling rejecting trademark for their namepost-gazette.com
- Asian-American group The Slants’ trademark case heads to Supreme CourtDenver Post
- Supreme Court to Slants: “Rock On!” Trademark Ban on Offensive Trademarks Held Unconstitutionaljdsupra.com
- Portland band The Slants can register trademarkThe Columbian
- Supreme Court rules rock band the Slants may trademark its name, striking down law banning offensive termsLA Times
- The First Amendment Protects The Trademark Registrability Of THE SLANTS And THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS Irrespective Of Political Correctness.jdsupra.com
- The Slants win trademark case in the U.S. Supreme Courtbizjournals.com
- SCOTUS and the Slants: Disparagement Proscription of § 2(A) of the Lanham Act Unconstitutionaljdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Strikes Down the Lanham Act’s Disparagement Clausejdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Rules “Disparagement Clause” of the Lanham Act Unconstitutionaljdsupra.com