Newstral
Article
Ars Technica on 2018-02-27 17:04
ESRB defends “fun” loot boxes as it starts labeling all “in-game purchases” [Updated]
Related news
- ESRB Issues Labeling Requirement for Video Games Containing Loot Boxesjdsupra.com
- The ESRB Is Wrong About Loot Boxes And GamblingForbes
- ESRB addresses loot box controversy with ‘in-game purchases’ labelengadget
- The ESRB is wrong about loot boxes and gamblingnews.ubc.ca
- ESRB Wasn’t Aware of Pending FTC Investigation Into Loot Boxesvariety.com
- ESRB Launches New Warning Label for Video Game Loot Boxesjdsupra.com
- TESRB warns consumers about in-game loot boxes in the vaguest way possibletheboar.org
- ESRB introduces a new label to indicate that a game has loot boxesThe Verge
- ESRB Introduces New Disclosure for Loot Boxes on the Heels of Regulatory and Litigation Developmentsjdsupra.com
- Lawmaker Wants ESRB to Put Age-Restrictions on Games with Loot Boxesbreitbart.com
- ESRB's in-game purchases label now includes a warning about loot boxesengadget
- Loot Boxes: Can the Video Game Industry Regulate Itself?infowars.com
- The ESRB now warns against in-game purchasesthenextweb.com
- Op-ed: Game companies need to cut the crap—loot boxes are obviously gamblingArs Technica
- US Senator Confronts The ESRB Over Loot Box Classification And AddictionForbes
- Fortnite puts an end to random loot box purchasesArs Technica
- Esports Alert: The Global Crackdown On Loot Boxesjdsupra.com
- The legislative fight over loot boxes expands to Washington stateArs Technica
- Despite backlash, loot boxes could be essential to gaming’s futureArs Technica
- The U.S. Senate is coming after ‘loot boxes’TechCrunch