Article

jdsupra.com on 2018-07-10 01:52

Change In E-Fax Technology Could Potentially Change Definition In TCPA Fax Class Actions

In Scoma Chiropractic, P.A. v. Dental Equities, LLC, MasterCard International, Inc., et al., Judge Steele stayed a Telephone Consumer Protection Act ...

Related news

Sending A Helping Hand: Seventh Circuit confirms rejection of strict liability standard for definition of a “sender” of unsolicited fax advertisements under the TCPA jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Cut Down to Size: Court Applies Bristol-Myers Squibb to Strike Class Definition Asserting Claims of Nonresident Class Members in TCPA Junk Fax Class Action jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
TCPA Doesn’t Cover Online Fax Services, FCC Rules jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
FCC: Online Fax Services that Receive Emailed Fax Messages Not Covered by TCPA jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
"Pretext Theory" as Applied to Unsolicited TCPA Fax Advertisement Claims jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Ninth Circuit Issues Opinion on TCPA ATDS Definition jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Behind the Faxes: Sixth Circuit Holds That Plaintiff in TCPA Junk Fax Class Action Adequately Pled That Informational Fax Violated TCPA Because it was a “Pretext” For Solicitation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Finding Solid Ground: Junk Fax TCPA Certification Opinions Slowly Aligning with Certification Approach Applied in Other TCPA Contexts jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
TCPA Class Actions Eleventh Circuit Narrows Scope of TCPA Splitting with Ninth Circuit jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Real Estate Industry Facing Threat of New TCPA Class Actions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
China Agritech May Cork Repeat TCPA Class Actions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Cork , China
Significant FCC Ruling Distinguishes Online Fax Services Not in Violation of TCPA jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Reality Wins: Sixth Circuit Affirms Companies Must Send Fax to Be “Sender” under TCPA jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
SCOTUS Decision in Unsolicited Fax Case Could Have Broader TCPA Implications jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
8th Circuit Affirms Lack of Article III Standing in TCPA Fax Advertisement Case jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
A Bridge to Somewhere: Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine Applicable in TCPA Fax Cases and ATDS Suits Alike jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
In Brief: Incidental “Advertisement” Language In a Fax Does Not Create a TCPA Violation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Predominance Dominance: Certification Denied in TCPA Fax Case Owing to Diverse Issues of Consent jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Unusual First Amendment Challenge Rejected in Fax TCPA Case: Court Upholds TCPA Applying Intermediate Scrutiny in Struggle Over Lawfulness of Statutory Damages jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Question Of Consent Turns Putative TCPA Fax Class Action Into Junk jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland