Article

jdsupra.com on 2018-10-02 15:00

Fourth District Holds CEQA Challenge To Ministerial Approval Of Development Project Modifications Barred By Res Judicata, Water Supply Assessment Not Required

“Birds of a feather flock together.” — Proverb - The Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. 2) affirmed a judgment entered after the ...

Miller Starr

Related news

Third District Holds Res Judicata Bars Relitigation of CEQA Claims In Second Writ Petition Challenging Reapproved Quarry Project And Partially Recirculated EIR: Barred Claims Were Either Adjudicated Adversely To Petitioner On First Petition, Or Could Have Been Litigated In First Action jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Some Good Georgian Res Judicata jdsupra.com
United States , Pennsylvania , Georgia
Chris Lazarini Outlines Application of Res Judicata jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Does Res Judicata Raise A Substantial Right? Depends.jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Objection to Proof of Claim Not Barred by Res Judicata jdsupra.com
Third District Upholds Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) Used Instead Of Traditional CEQA Document To Approve High-Rise, High-Density Mixed-Use Condo Housing Project In Sacramento’s Midtown jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Yuba , Placer
Untimely CEQA Suit Barred Regardless of Substantive Merits jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Chancery Court Finds that Res Judicata Bars Plaintiff’S Demand for Information Rights under Merger Agreement jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
New York’s Highest Court Asked To Clarify Res Judicata Effect Of Small Claims Court Judgments jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , New York
Third Circuit: Releases Contained In Confirmed Chapter 11 Plans Are Res Judicata jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Chancery Holds That Res Judicata Precludes Plaintiff’s Claim for Information Rights Under Merger Agreement jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Dismissal on Procedural Grounds May Bar Claims for Later Infringement Under Res Judicata jdsupra.com
California
CEQA Plaintiff’s Failure To Appeal Incorrectly Labeled “Interlocutory” Decision Granting Peremptory Writ Barred Appellate Review Of Decision On Later Appeal From Post-Judgment Order Erroneously Labeled “Final Judgment”jdsupra.com
United States , Switzerland , Hollister , California , San Francisco
Correctional Officers FEHA Claims are Barred by Res Judicata for Already Adjudicated Workers’ Compensation Cases jdsupra.com
No Déjà Vu – Lender Liability Claims Barred by Res Judicata Effect of Bankruptcy Sale Order jdsupra.com
United Kingdom
Failure To Appeal First Zoning Board Decision Results In Application Of Factual Res Judicata To Second Application For Similar Relief jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Rockville Centre
Fourth District Rejects Coastal Act/CEQA-Based Challenges To Commission’s Certification of San Diego Port Plan Amendment As Time-Barred For Failure To Join Indispensable Parties Within Limitations Period jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , San Francisco , Pasadena
District Court Rejects “Worthless Services” FCA Claim, Interprets First-to File Bar and Res Judicata in FCA Context jdsupra.com
United States
Appellate Court Rejects CEQA Claims on Project Modifications Made After Final EIR Published jdsupra.com
Temecula , Riverside , California
Fifth District Holds CARB Violated CEQA And APA In Approving Modifications To Truck And Bus Regulation jdsupra.com
California