Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2019-01-30 20:03
With Everyone Being the Victim of a Data Breach, the Illinois Supreme Court’s Decision Not Requiring Actual Harm to Pursue a Claim for Improper Collection of Biometric Data May Give a Hint of the Future
Related news
- No Harm, Still a Foul: Illinois Supreme Court Rules on the Collection of Biometric Datajdsupra.com
- Just How Important Is It to Protect the Privacy of Biometric Data?jdsupra.com
- Private Lawsuit May Move Forward Over Collection of Biometric Datajdsupra.com
- The Eyes are the Window to the Soul…and Liquidated Damages: Illinois Supreme Court Raises the Stakes on Employer Use of Biometric Datajdsupra.com
- Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing – High Court’s Ongoing Interpretation of the Data Protection Actjdsupra.com
- Proposed Legislation In Massachusetts Would Create Private Right Of Action For Improper Collection Of Personal Or Biometric Informationjdsupra.com
- Biometric Data: Companies Should Act to Mitigate Risks in the Face of Growing Regulations and Increased Risk for Liabilityjdsupra.com
- Biometric Data Risks Lawsuitsjdsupra.com
- New Guidelines on Collecting Biometric Data Help Businesses Stay Ahead of the Gamejdsupra.com
- Examining the Likely Impact of Washington’s My Health, My Data Act on Class Action Litigation Involving Biometric Datajdsupra.com
- Measuring The Impact Of The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Actjdsupra.com
- Don’t Smile at the Camera – New Biometric Data Lawsjdsupra.com
- Facing the Future of Biometric Information for Payment Verificationjdsupra.com
- Social Links: An EU law to protect copyright owners online; collecting biometric data without running afoul of the law; influencers’ attempts to appear more authenticjdsupra.com
- Biometric Data Privacy Act Class Action Dismissed for Lack of Actual Injuryjdsupra.com
- Illinois Court Says Biometric Fingerprint is Violation of Privacy, Even Without Injury: Data Privacy Trendsjdsupra.com
- Hotel Chain Hit with Class Action Alleging “Misuse” of Biometric Datajdsupra.com
- The Improper Use of Governmental “Pre-Approved” Plansjdsupra.com
- Arizona Tests The Nature Of The Supreme Court’s Original Jurisdictionjdsupra.com
- Overview of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 2017-18 Termjdsupra.com