Article

jdsupra.com on 2019-06-26 20:33

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That States Cannot Tax Trusts Based Solely On Location Of Beneficiaries

In a closely-watched decision, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a beneficiary’s residence within a state alone does not subject a trust ...

Related news

Trustees of Revocable Trusts May Owe Duties to Contingent Beneficiaries jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Trusts, Beneficiaries, And The Application Of State Income Tax jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
State Tax on Trust Income Based Solely on In-State Residence of Beneficiaries Found Unconstitutional jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Beneficiaries of Irrevocable Trusts may claim PRE jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Proposed Tax Reform Regulations: Application of Section 199A to Estates, Trusts, and Beneficiaries jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Client Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects State Attempt to Tax Undistributed Income of a Trust Based Solely on Trust Beneficiaries Residing in the State jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Sets Limits on State Income Taxation of Trusts jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Understanding Revocable Trusts jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Special Needs Trusts Update jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Location, Location, Location: Recent Developments in Location Data Privacy jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Wills, Trusts & Estates: Plain and Simple – Grantor Trusts: What the Heck Are They?jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Foreign Trusts and the IRS jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Unanimously Decides Relator May Use Ten-Year Limitation Period In Declined FCA Case jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Upholds Changes To Beneficiaries Upon Divorce jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court: Bankruptcy Law Cannot Unilaterally Revoke Trademark License jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
U.S. Supreme Court: "All the Expenses" Does Not Include Attorney’s Fees - In Peter v. Nantkwest, Inc., the Supreme Court unanimously held that the United States Patent and Trademark Office cannot recover attorney's fees for district court actions brought under 35 U.S.C. § 145.jdsupra.com
California , Switzerland , United States
Supreme Court: Government Cannot Challenge Patent Validity in IPR jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Rules HHS Cannot Take Short-Cuts in Rulemaking jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Client Alert: Supreme Court Holds Bankruptcy Cannot Nullify License Agreement jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court: Third-Party Defendants Cannot Remove to Federal Court jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland