Article

jdsupra.com on 2019-07-08 19:23

Third Circuit Holds Amazon Liable As a Product Seller – Communications Decency Act Not Applicable to Sale and Distribution Strict Liability Claims

Defective products harm consumers. Courts have consistently held, however, that Amazon is not liable for defective products acquired through its ...

Heather Oberdorf

Related news

Court Finds Buyer Not Liable for Seller Under Successor Liability Theory jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Reform of the criminal liability regime applicable to legal persons jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Taking The "Strict" Out Of Treasurer Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Oregon Court Imposes Strict Liability for Missed Meal Breaks jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Professional Liability Insurer Found Liable for Bad Faith jdsupra.com
California
Premises Liability – Nightclub Liable for Rape of Patron by Employee jdsupra.com
West Hollywood , California
Strict Liability for Lack of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials jdsupra.com
Brookwood , Houston , Chicago , Ohio , Cleveland Clinic
Ninth Circuit Expands Securities Seller Liability to Social Media Promoters jdsupra.com
Washington , Oregon , Pacific Northwest , United States
No Partnership, No Common Control, No Withdrawal Liability: Private Equity Funds Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Security Company Found Vicariously Liable for TCPA Violations Committed by Lead Seller jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Strict Liability Energy: IPO Litigation and Risk Management jdsupra.com
United States
Strict Liability in FedEx's Appeal: Implications for Export Controls jdsupra.com
China , United Arab Emirates , Syria , The Settlement , United States
Amazon Subject to Strict Products Liability in California jdsupra.com
China , Oakland , California
Church Affiliate Is Exempt From FEHA Liability, But Liable for $1.9 Million On Other Theories jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
First Circuit Finds That Funds Were Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
First Circuit Holds Affiliated Investment Funds Not Liable For Multiemployer Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Private Investment Funds Not Liable for Portfolio Company's Pension Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
First Circuit Rules that Private Equity Funds Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Third Circuit Holds Online Retailers May Be Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Under Pennsylvania Product Liability Laws jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Tennessee , Maryland
Suffering From Withdrawal Following An Acquisition: Private Equity Company Liable For Successor Withdrawal Liability jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland