Newstral
Article
WRAL on 2019-12-03 11:00
Editorial: Silent Sam settlement gives rise to questions of UNC board's competence
Related news
- N.C. university's Silent Sam settlement draws suitnwaonline.com
- With 'Silent Sam' deal, UNC betrayed its missionCNN
- UNC board chair: Effort to rescind 'Silent Sam' deal 'irresponsible'WRAL
- UNC system, Sons of Confederate Veterans reach settlement on Silent SamWRAL
- Member of UNC Board of Governors wants those who toppled 'Silent Sam' to face chargesWRAL
- Lawyer: Extra $75,000 in 'Silent Sam' deal like 'prenuptial agreement' with UNCWRAL
- UNC-CH students, faculty want money from 'Silent Sam' side deal returnedWRAL
- With 'Silent Sam' gone from UNC-CH, chancellor to quickly followWRAL
- Interim UNC system president doesn't want 'Silent Sam' to return to Chapel Hill campusWRAL
- UNC Can No Longer Remain Silent On Silent Samhuffingtonpost.com
- UNC Faculty Members Call for the Removal of Silent Samindyweek.com
- Those who object to 'Silent Sam' rally on UNC anniversaryWRAL
- Petition urges UNC to remove Silent Sam Confederate statuenewsobserver.com
- UNC declines Cooper’s invitation to remove ‘Silent Sam’ Confederate memorialnewsobserver.com
- TUNC ‘Silent Sam’ statue debate resembles Ole Miss contextualization processthedmonline.com
- The Latest: Activist: UNC had decades to remove 'Silent Sam'The Findlay Courier
- How much does it cost UNC to protect Silent Sam?newsobserver.com
- Deadline extended for UNC officials’ plan for ‘Silent Sam’Seattle Times
- UNC grapples with the fate of 'Silent Sam' Confederate monumentCNN
- Who is the group getting $2.5M in 'Silent Sam' settlement?WRAL