Newstral
Article
San Jose Mercury News on 2020-01-31 06:10
Editorial: A Senate impeachment trial without witnesses is a sham
Related news
- Udall, Heinrich: Trial without witnesses a shamabqjournal.com
- Republicans 'open to Senate impeachment witnesses'BBC
- Trump’s former chief of staff says Senate impeachment trial without witnesses is ‘a job only half done’nj.com
- HSenate Must Not Legitimize House’s Sham Impeachmenthamodia.com
- Booker says he wants witnesses at Trump’s Senate impeachment trialnj.com
- Cardin condemns Senate vote on witnesses in impeachment trialthedailyrecord.com
- Senate approves impeachment trial rules, rejecting witnessesocregister.com
- The Senate just rejected witnesses in Trump’s impeachment trial — clearing the way for acquittalvox.com
- Senate rejects witnesses in Trump impeachment trialtribuneonlineng.com
- Sham impeachment of Mayorkas rightly dismissed by the U.S. Senateocregister.com
- Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow: Senate impeachment trial witnesses unlikely, but 'we are prepared for every contingency'Fox News
- Without Impeachment Witnesses, the Senate Majority Sees No Need for Impeachment Witnessesslate.com
- No witnesses: Senate rejects further testimony at Trump impeachment trialThe Day
- Susan Collins says she is disappointed the Senate voted against calling impeachment witnessesbangordailynews.com
- SSenate rejects witnesses in Trump impeachment trial, ensuring acquittalsyracuse.com
- NWithout witnesses, impartial justice cannot be served in an impeachment trialntdaily.com
- APoll: 75 percent say Senate should allow witnesses in impeachment trialaugustafreepress.com
- MSenate close to rejecting Trump impeachment trial witnesses as Murkowski says ‘no’marketwatch.com
- Senate rejects witnesses in Trump impeachment trial, clearing way for acquittalvanguardngr.com
- Quinnipiac poll: 75% of voters want witnesses for Senate impeachment trialCNN