Article

jdsupra.com on 2020-02-12 17:40

Chancery Further Explains the “Proper Purpose” Requirement for Section 220 Demands

Lebanon County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., C.A. No. 2019-0527-JTL (Del. Ch. Jan. 13, 2020). Section 220 of ...

Related news

Chancery Addresses Books and Records Demand Under Section 220 by Papa John’s Founder jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Section 220 Books and Records Demand Denied by Court of Chancery jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Chancery Denies Section 220 Bid for Executive Compensation Records Involving Facebook jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Bid
Delaware Chancery Declines Post-Filing Use of Section 220 Books and Records Inspection Request jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware
Delaware Court of Chancery Holds that a Stockholder’s Disagreement with a Board’s Business Judgment and Intent to Pursue a Proxy Contest is Not a “Proper Purpose” for a Section 220 Demand jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware , High River
Delaware Chancery Court Holds That Stockholders Had a “Proper Purpose” to Seek Board Materials From Opioid Distributor, and Orders a 30(b)(6) Deposition, in Section 220 Books and Records Action jdsupra.com
California , Switzerland , Delaware , Florida , United States
M&A Watch: Seeking Your True Purpose? Delaware Offers Guidance on Section 220 Requests jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware
Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Noteworthy Decision Denying Section 220 Demand and Reinforcing Judicial Deference on Executive Compensation Decisions jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware , Pennsylvania
Delaware Supreme Court Accepts Interlocutory Appeal of Court of Chancery Decision Granting Stockholders’ Request to Inspect Books and Records, and to Conduct a Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition in a Section 220 Action jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware
Chancery Rejects Challenge to Delaware as Proper Venue in Books and Records Action jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware
Mutuality – Irrefutable Requirement for Setoff Under Section 553 jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Corwin Doctrine Ruled Inapplicable in Section 220 Litigation jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Court of Chancery Dissolves Limited Partnership Upon Finding General Partner Unable To Achieve Its Business Purpose jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Court Of Chancery Stresses Proper Procedure When Relying On A Contractual Safe Harbor In The MLP Context jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Safe Harbor
Delaware Court Of Chancery Addresses Director Independence For the Purpose Of Responding to a Stockholder Demand jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Beyond Board Minutes and Stockholder Lists – Section 220 Books and Records Demands May Yield Much More jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Much More
District Of Delaware Finds Successful Section 220 Action Tolled Claims For Alleged Mismanagement jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Delaware
Implications for Section 220 ‘Books and Records’ Demands Following High River Limited Partnership jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , High River
Chancery Court Reaffirms Delaware Policy of Broad Section 220 Stockholder Inspection Rights jdsupra.com
United States , Delaware , Lebanon
Delaware Court Of Chancery Rejects Demand To Inspect Books And Records Under Section 220 To Aid In Proxy Contest jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Cranz