DeutschNewstral
Article
Ars Technica on 2020-02-26 22:56
First Amendment doesn’t apply on YouTube; judges reject PragerU lawsuit
Related news
PragerU Lawyer: Google and YouTube Need 'Viewpoint Neutral' Rules that 'Apply Equally to All'breitbart.com- TGingrich suggests 14th Amendment doesn’t apply todaythehill.com
- PragerU Files New Lawsuit Against Googlebreitbart.com
PragerU files new lawsuit against Google in YouTube 'censorship' rowFox News- TLetter: First Amendment doesn’t require even-handednesstwincities.com
Why Facebook doesn’t follow the First AmendmentThe Verge
Does Disqualification Under the 14th Amendment Even Apply to Trump?nysun.com- PragerU sues YouTube, says it censors conservative videosArs Technica
Sunstein: Does the 25th Amendment apply to Trump? Quite possibly.Denver Post
Judges rule that YouTube isn't bound by the First Amendmentengadget- What’s Colorado Amendment W: Judges on the ballotDenver Post
National Assembly should reject proposed immunity for judges –Adegboruwapunchng.com
Double setback for Trump: Judges reject calls to dismiss chargesThe Times of India- TikTok Blacklists PragerUbreitbart.com
PragerU Sues Google and YouTube for Censoring Videoscanadafreepress.com
Racial Bias Doesn’t Fully Explain Manafort’s Sentence. It’s Unchecked Judges.POLITICO
Why the ‘Biden Rule’ Doesn’t Apply in 2020wsj.com- Spotify Blacklists PragerU Adsbreitbart.com
Presumption of innocence doesn’t apply to Brett Kavanaugh allegationsreviewjournal.com
Mark Zuckerberg Doesn’t Know What the First Amendment Is ForThe New Yorker