Article

The New York Times on 2020-08-11 19:22

Supreme Court Won’t Ease Oregon’s Referendum Rules During the Pandemic

The court’s order in effect blocked a ballot measure intended to address partisan gerrymandering.

Related news

Supreme Court Won’t Block Surgery for Transgender Inmate The New York Times
San Francisco , Idaho
Supreme Court won’t make unanimous jury requirement retroactive oregonlive.com
California , Puerto Rico , Louisiana , Oregon , Washington
Supreme Court rules California churches may open despite the pandemic bradenton.com
Los Angeles , New York , Pasadena , Chula Vista , San Francisco
Supreme Court Won’t Block Ruling to Halt Work on Keystone XL Pipeline The New York Times
Roanoke , San Francisco , Gulf of Mexico , Nebraska , Canada
Supreme Court Won’t Consider Arkansas Abortion Law The New York Times
Fayetteville , Little Rock , Texas , Arkansas
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to Law Barring Homeless People From Sleeping Outdoors The New York Times
Milan , California , Idaho , Boise , San Francisco
Supreme Court won’t stop climate change lawsuit San Jose Mercury News
Oregon
Supreme Court Won’t Revive Trump Policy Limiting Asylum The New York Times
United States , Mexico
Oregon’s close governor’s race is a referendum on Portland The Economist
United States , Seattle , San Diego , Minneapolis , Old Mombasa
Oregon’s Supreme Court Chief Justice Walters to retire kentucky.com
Eugene , Oregon
Governor defends decision to vaccinate teachers before Oregon’s elderly -- saying kids are ‘deeply impacted by the pandemic’oregonlive.com
Jackson , Malheur , Klamath Falls , Salem , Medford