Newstral
Article
amny.com on 2021-11-12 14:00
Lawsuit over Subway tuna now says chicken, pork, cattle DNA were detected
Related news
- Subway tuna lawsuit is back, now alleging samples have chicken, pork, cattle DNASeattle Times
- 2 customers sue Subway, claiming tuna is ‘anything but tuna’Seattle Times
- Subway: Time to end ‘outrageous’ lawsuit over its tunaamny.com
- 2 Alameda County customers sue Subway, claiming the tuna sandwich is ‘anything but tuna’San Jose Mercury News
- Subway tuna sandwich lawsuit dismissed but controversy remainsSydney Morning Herald
- Fish fried: Subway can be sued over '100% tuna' claimsNew York Post
- Subway fighting ‘fake’ tuna lawsuit with cheeky marketing blitzNew York Post
- Judge Dismisses Subway 100% Tuna Lawsuit For Nowjdsupra.com
- Subway can be sued over its 100% tuna claims, U.S. judge rulesCBC
- Judge Permits Revised 100% Tuna Claim Against Subway To Proceed On Select Misrepresentation Theoriesjdsupra.com
- Is A Subway Tuna Sandwich Made Of Bread And Tuna? It Depends On The Law SuitForbes
- 3,895 pounds of chicken, pork bologna recalledomakchronicle.com
- Contagious horse and cattle virus detected in UtahThe Salt Lake Tribune
- Bird flu detected in herd of North Carolina cattleWRAL
- Minnesota frozen food company recalls pork, chicken productsSeattle Times
- Why 7-Eleven is getting into tuna jerky, algae oil popcorn and pigless pork rindsCNN
- MSubway is chewed out after lab tests find no tuna DNA in its tuna sandwiches4 min readmarketwatch.com