Article

jdsupra.com on 2022-06-15 19:54

A Job Applicant Is Not An Employee For Compensation Purposes

SSeyfarth Synopsis: The Ninth Circuit recently concluded that job applicants are not entitled to compensation for time devoted to pre-employment drug ...

Related news

Private Physician Plaintiff Not “Employee” Of Hospital For Title VII Purposes jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
How Much Do You Make? – New OFCCP Regulations Protect Employee And Job Applicant Discussions on Compensation jdsupra.com
New Year
A Professional Football Player May Not Be a Seasonal Employee For Purposes of Calculating An Average Weekly Wage jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland , Pennsylvania
Portland company, staffing firm will pay $225,000 to deaf job applicant in settlement oregonlive.com
California , Hawthorne , Portland
The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 12: Employee and Job Applicant Information is Exempt from CCPA Compliance for One More Year jdsupra.com
United States , Switzerland , California
NLR school job gets 15th applicant Arkansas Online
Little Rock , California , Arkansas , North Little Rock
Deaf job applicant wins $225K settlement over discrimination Merced Sun-Star
Portland , Oregon
Have You Reviewed Your Employee Compensation?jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
‘Google Fired Me For Not Rejecting White & Asian Job Applicants,’ Ex-Employee Alleges infowars.com
California
Just Where Was Your Employee Injured And Why It Matters: Workers’ Compensation And The “Coming And Going” Rule jdsupra.com
Texas , Illinois , California , Ohio
CCPA QOTD: What are the employee/applicant and “business to business” exemptions?jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
New FEHA Regulations to Limit Employer Consideration of California Applicant/Employee Criminal Histories jdsupra.com
Proves , New California , California