Article

engadget on 2023-05-19 12:35

The Supreme Court’s Warhol decision could have huge copyright implications for ‘fair use’

The Supreme Court has ruled that Andy Warhol has infringed on the copyright of Lynn Goldsmith, the photographer who took the image that he used for ...

Related news

Supreme Court’s Warhol Decision Transforms Law of Fair Use by Emphasizing Importance of the “Purpose” of the Works at Issue jdsupra.com
Americas , New York , Pittsburgh
Supreme Court Rules Against Warhol Estate in Copyright Dispute Over Use of Photo of Prince for Magazine Cover — Potentially Wide-Reaching Implications for Generative AI for Visual Art jdsupra.com
A Clear-Cut Win for Artists or a Stifling Effect on Artistic Creation? How Copyright Law Experts View the Supreme Court’s Warhol Decision variety.com
Colombia
Apex court’s decision will have implications for its legitimacy nation.co.ke
Lower Austria , Kilome , Kenya , Apex
Supreme Court’s Decision in Amex: Summary and Potential Implications jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Court to hear Warhol copyright dispute nwaonline.com
New York
The Supreme Court’s Fashionable Case: Implications for Expanding Copyright Protection to Apparel jdsupra.com
Warhol v. Goldsmith: Creative Fair Use or Copyright Infringement?jdsupra.com
The Supreme Court’s worst decision sacbee.com
Philippines , South Carolina , Japan , United States , Pittsburgh
Honig: Implications of SCOTUS decision on census are huge CNN
Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in copyright dispute over Prince portrait San Jose Mercury News
TJudge: Andy Warhol didn’t violate Prince picture copyright twincities.com
New York , Halfway
Long-Running Andy Warhol Copyright Dispute Reaches Supreme Court hyperallergic.com
Brooklyn Museum
Andy Warhol wins in Prince photographer copyright fight dazeddigital.com