Newstral
Article
LA Times on 2024-03-07 02:43
Did Anaheim violate Brown Act in Angel Stadium negotiations? Courts twice say no
Related news
- Anaheim says Angel Stadium talks didn’t violate state lawocregister.com
- What’s Angel Stadium worth? Anaheim is getting an appraisal done for negotiations with baseball teamocregister.com
- Appeals court: Anaheim largely complied with open meetings law during Angel Stadium negotiationsocregister.com
- Anaheim pressured to approve Angel Stadium deal; deadline givenocregister.com
- Why the Anaheim City Council nixed the Angel Stadium saleocregister.com
- Angel Stadium: Anaheim residents’ group files court appeal in Brown Act suitocregister.com
- Grand jury rips Anaheim for lack of transparency in Angel Stadium sale negotiationsLA Times
- Anaheim council looking at new timeline for Angel Stadium development agreementocregister.com
- On eve of vote, current and former Anaheim mayors debate Angel Stadium saleocregister.com
- Judge pauses sale of Angel Stadium amid FBI corruption probe of Anaheim mayorLA Times
- Angels challenge Anaheim on proposed development next to Angel StadiumLA Times
- State to Anaheim: Angel Stadium sale violates affordable housing lawocregister.com
- Anaheim won’t see Angel Stadium development plans for another monthocregister.com
- Feds investigating Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu over Angel Stadium saleocregister.com
- Angels, Anaheim tussle over Chinese developers' project near Angel Stadiumocregister.com
- New Anaheim council means fresh look at Angel Stadium’s futureocregister.com
- Anaheim council tweaks timeline for Angel Stadium dealocregister.com
- Anaheim Approves Angel Stadium SaleKTLA 5
- Letter demanding vote on Angel Stadium sale be reversed for more public discussion sent to Anaheimocregister.com
- Ex-Anaheim mayor to plead guilty in federal corruption case over Angel Stadium saleSeattle Times