Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2015-03-03 20:33
California Supreme Court Upholds Most Commonly Used CEQA Categorical Exemptions
Related news
- CA Supreme Court Provides Key CEQA Guidance Regarding Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- It’s Not Unusual: California Supreme Court Declines to Expand “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Protects CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Clarifies Application Of The “Unusual Circumstances” Exception To Categorical Exemptions Under CEQAjdsupra.com
- CEQA Alert: California Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Guidance on the “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to CEQA’s Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Establishes the Standard of Review for the Unusual Circumstances Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Strengthens CEQA’s Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- A Recent Ruling Involving Unlined Landfills Highlights the Pitfalls of Relying on Categorical Exemptions under CEQAjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Issues CEQA Ruling Regarding Categorical Exemptions - The Practical Result of the Court's Decision Is That Categorical Exemptions Remain a Viable Tool to Review Small Projects Across the Statejdsupra.com
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Case Opinion Ordered Slightly Modified By Supreme Court; Berkeley Hillside Preservation Judgment Is Unaffectedjdsupra.com
- Too many CEQA exemptionsLA Times
- Can You Clear Me Now? Sixth District Upholds Santa Cruz County’s CEQA Categorical Exemption For Project To Install Microcell Transmitters On Utility Poles In Rural Aptos Areajdsupra.com
- Ruling Complicated Use of CEQA's Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Upholds San Diego’s CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption Determination For Verizon’s Faux Tree Wireless Telecommunications Facility In Dedicated Public Park, Rejects City Charter Inconsistency Argumentsjdsupra.com
- Location Exception to CEQA’s Categorical Exemptions Applies Only to Designated Environmental Resources Affected by The Projectjdsupra.com
- Court Upholds Infill Development Categorical Exemption for Gas Station in Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Construes CEQA’s “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to Categorical Exemptions in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley Decisionjdsupra.com
- First District Upholds CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption For Single Family Residence Projects In Berkeley Hills, Rejects Claim That “Location” Exception Applies Based On Site’s Location Within Mapped Earthquake Fault And Landslide Areasjdsupra.com
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Must Be Agendized under Brown Actjdsupra.com
- Berkeley Hillside CEQA Cat Ex Case Redux: Kapors Get Their Mansion, First District’s Belatedly Published Opinion Upholds City’s Decision That “Unusual Circumstances” Exception Does Not Applyjdsupra.com