Newstral
Article
bizjournals.com on 2015-06-01 17:00
Should Alaska Airlines passengers be forced to pay a fee to help upgrade Sea-Tac Airport’s international arrivals facility?
Related news
- Column: It’s unfair to burden Walla Walla passengers for Sea-Tac fixesunion-bulletin.com
- It’s unfair to tax all Sea-Tac passengers for new international terminalold.seattletimes.com
- Sea-Tac jammed: ‘Crazy, crazy numbers’ of passengers this yearseattletimes.com
- Flight arrivals and departures improve at Sea-Tac airport, but many travelers are still delayedSeattle Times
- Sea-Tac to require passengers, workers to cover facesMerced Sun-Star
- Passengers make Sea-Tac ninth busiest airport in U.S.thenewstribune.com
- Airlines ask Sea-Tac to cut fees, blaming some of its budget problem on pandemic bailouts for airport’s shops and restaurantsSeattle Times
- New gates, posh lounge at Sea-Tac airport give Alaska Airlines an upgradeSeattle Times
- Sea-Tac Airport’s facelift means upgrades … and work zonesSeattle Times
- Sea-Tac Airport’s 75th anniversary takes off amid constant changeSeattle Times
- Alaska Airlines flight forced to return to Sea-Tac after masked man threatens passengersAlaska Dispatch News
- New Sea-Tac program allows non-ticketed passengers to go beyond security checkpointSeattle Times
- Sea-Tac Airport to require all passengers, employees to wear face coveringsSeattle Times
- Alaska flight forced to return to Sea-Tac Airport after man threatens passengers Saturday nightSeattle Times
- First passengers arrive at SLO airport’s ‘beautiful’ new terminalsanluisobispo.com
- Who’s paying for Sea-Tac Airport’s new $766M international arrivals facility?bizjournals.com
- What travelers should know about Sea-Tac Airport’s new arrivals facilitySeattle Times
- Alaska Airlines flight returns to Sea-Tac after passengers hear person trapped in cargo hold - Mon, 13 Apr 2015 PSTThe Spokesman-Review