DeutschNewstral
Article
bizjournals.com on 2015-08-10 20:28
Final cost for Duke Energy’s Sutton plant 18% below original estimate
Related news
- Anger, suspicion dominate S.C. public hearing on Duke Energy’s Foothills transmission linebizjournals.com
Coal ash is focus in Duke Energy’s $478M rate increase bidseattletimes.com- Duke Energy’s increase in use of natural gas is largest among big fossil-fuel utilitiesbizjournals.com
- Staff says regulators should reject part of Duke Energy’s proposed Asheville natural gas plant as ‘problematic’bizjournals.com
- N.C. regulators offer to ‘split the baby’ on appeal over Duke Energy’s $1.1B Asheville plantbizjournals.com
- N.C. fines Duke Energy $25.1M for polluting groundwater at Suttonbizjournals.com
- N.C. fines Duke Energy $21.5M for polluting groundwater at Suttonbizjournals.com
- Advocacy groups to challenge Duke Energy’s proposed $750M Asheville plantbizjournals.com
Residents skeptical of Duke Energy’s Arden ash plansmountainx.com- Letter: ‘No’ to Duke Energy’s proposed rate hikemountainx.com
Brookfield interested in Duke Energy’s Latin America plants, sources sayThe Globe and Mail- TDuke Energy’s solar rebates power private solar system growththecharlotteweekly.com
- Duke Energy proposes two small units at its Sutton Plant near Wilmingtonbizjournals.com
Cooper should crack down on Duke Energy’s hazardsnewsobserver.com- DVirtual Public Hearing Set On Duke Energy’s Requested Increasedillonheraldonline.com
- Duke Energy proposes two small gas-fired units at its Sutton Plantbizjournals.com
- Florence rains wash some coal ash from landfill at Duke Energy’s Sutton plantbizjournals.com
- NC tests dispute claims of coal-ash contamination near Duke Energy’s Sutton plantbizjournals.com
- NC tests dispute coal-ash contamination claims near Duke Energy’s Sutton plantbizjournals.com