DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2016-07-28 21:47
Second District Upholds Application of CEQA’s Class 3 Categorical Exemption For New Small Structures To City’s Approval of Small Car Wash/Coffee Shop Project, Rejects Appellants’ Attempt To Invoke Unusual Circumstances Exception
Related news
- CEQA Alert: California Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Guidance on the “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to CEQA’s Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Location Exception to CEQA’s Categorical Exemptions Applies Only to Designated Environmental Resources Affected by The Projectjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Construes CEQA’s “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to Categorical Exemptions in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley Decisionjdsupra.com
- It’s Not Unusual: California Supreme Court Declines to Expand “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Strengthens CEQA’s Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Establishes the Standard of Review for the Unusual Circumstances Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Clarifies Application Of The “Unusual Circumstances” Exception To Categorical Exemptions Under CEQAjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Announces New Test for CEQA “Unusual Circumstances” Exceptionjdsupra.com
- Berkeley Hillside CEQA Cat Ex Case Redux: Kapors Get Their Mansion, First District’s Belatedly Published Opinion Upholds City’s Decision That “Unusual Circumstances” Exception Does Not Applyjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Issues CEQA Ruling Regarding Categorical Exemptions - The Practical Result of the Court's Decision Is That Categorical Exemptions Remain a Viable Tool to Review Small Projects Across the Statejdsupra.com
- First District Upholds CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption For Single Family Residence Projects In Berkeley Hills, Rejects Claim That “Location” Exception Applies Based On Site’s Location Within Mapped Earthquake Fault And Landslide Areasjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Upholds Most Commonly Used CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Court Finds Use of Addendum Improper as Project’s GHG Emissions Likely Outside the Scope of Prior Programmatic EIR and Unusual Circumstances Exception Applied to Use of Infill Exemptionjdsupra.com
- Court Upholds Infill Development Categorical Exemption for Gas Station in Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- Ruling Complicated Use of CEQA's Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Protects CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Case Opinion Ordered Slightly Modified By Supreme Court; Berkeley Hillside Preservation Judgment Is Unaffectedjdsupra.com
- Second District Addresses CEQA’s Class 32 Infill Exemption Criteriajdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Reinforces CEQA’s Definition of a Projectjdsupra.com
England should invoke exceptional circumstances rule for Sam Underhill - Ben KayShropshire Star