DeutschNewstral
Article
Denver Post on 2019-04-13 19:43
CU regents defend selection of presidential finalist Mark Kennedy: “We did not rush and did not compromise”
Related news
- CU regents nominate interim president Todd Saliman as sole finalist to be presidentDenver Post
- CU faculty criticize presidential search process as protesters rally on Boulder campus to decry finalistDenver Post
- Mark Kennedy updates CU regents on strategic plan progressDenver Post
- Mark Udall calls on CU to restart presidential search; university denies regents only considered Republicans as “viable candidates”Denver Post
- SCU presidential finalist fields diversity questions in forumsentinelcolorado.com
- CU regents approve new contract for AD Rick GeorgeDenver Post
- Guest commentary: CU Regents right to fight open records ruling on presidential candidatesDenver Post
- Opinion: CU Regents should disclose their finalists for presidentDenver Post
- Chance Hill resigns from CU Board of RegentsDenver Post
- CU regents pick leader of presidential search teamDenver Post
- Feedback on CU presidential candidate Mark Kennedy not positiveDenver Post
- CU Board of Regents “needs to be de-politicized,” Colorado House speaker saysDenver Post
- Usually tame CU Regents race is attracting money and heated rhetoricDenver Post
- Editorial: Kennedy’s resignation is the right thing; now CU regents must fix this messDenver Post
- SENDORSEMENT: Smith would bring unique experience and drive to reduce CU tuition to board of regentssentinelcolorado.com
- CU Board of Regents to vote on Mark Kennedy’s departure deal WednesdayDenver Post
- Editorial: We’ve got no idea if Mark R. Kennedy is a good pick to head the CU system … and neither to the regentsDenver Post
CU Boulder campus renovations approved by CU regentsdailycamera.com- Guest commentary: The law is clear that CU regents must disclose all finalists in presidential searchDenver Post