DeutschNewstral
Article
Denver Post on 2020-05-01 08:59
Guest commentary: The law is clear that CU regents must disclose all finalists in presidential search
Related news
- Opinion: CU Regents should disclose their finalists for presidentDenver Post
- Guest commentary: CU Regents right to fight open records ruling on presidential candidatesDenver Post
- Guest Commentary: CU’s Republican regents should be ashamed of this partisan processDenver Post
- Guest Commentary: We stand by the thorough process that got us Mark Kennedy as finalist for CU presidentDenver Post
- CU regents nominate interim president Todd Saliman as sole finalist to be presidentDenver Post
- Editorial: Kennedy’s resignation is the right thing; now CU regents must fix this messDenver Post
- Mark Udall calls on CU to restart presidential search; university denies regents only considered Republicans as “viable candidates”Denver Post
- SIlana Spiegel jumps early in CU Regents race for CD6sentinelcolorado.com
- Chance Hill resigns from CU Board of RegentsDenver Post
CU regents to discuss divesting from fossil fuelsThe Daily Sentinel- Guest Commentary: Debate over new CU president Kennedy example of need for civility in discourseDenver Post
- Guest Commentary: CU regents have let Trump’s administration get away with censorship of academic researchDenver Post
- CU Board of Regents “needs to be de-politicized,” Colorado House speaker saysDenver Post
- Usually tame CU Regents race is attracting money and heated rhetoricDenver Post
- Guest Commentary: State’s journalists gain much-needed legal firepowerDenver Post
CU Boulder campus renovations approved by CU regentsdailycamera.com- SCU regents discuss whether future regents should be paidsentinelcolorado.com
- CU regents defend selection of presidential finalist Mark Kennedy: “We did not rush and did not compromise”Denver Post
Guest commentary: Primary election decodednorthfortynews.com- Guest Commentary: Freedom's 800th birthdayDenver Post