Newstral
Article
Seattle Times on 2020-01-18 02:02
U.S. Supreme Court to consider Washington’s 2016 ‘faithless electors,’ who refused to vote for Hillary Clinton
Related news
Justices to consider faithless electors, ahead of 2020 votePOLITICO
The Economist explains: Faithless electorsThe Economist
Court questions sides on 'faithless electors'Arkansas Online
Electoral College: Court sides with faithless electorscsindy.com
Court: Removing 'faithless' electors may be unconstitutionalPOLITICO
‘Faithless Electors’ at the Supreme Courtwsj.com
U.S. Supreme Court seems skeptical of Washington’s ‘faithless electors;’ ruling expected by end of JuneSeattle Times
Justices hear election year cases over 'faithless electors'Star Tribune
Justices hear election year cases over ‘faithless electors’bradenton.com
Supreme Court: States Can Punish 'Faithless Electors'; Unanimous Decisionbreitbart.com
Washington’s ‘faithless electors’ head to Supreme Court in a case that could throw 2020 election into chaosSeattle Times
U.S. Supreme Court rules against Washington ‘faithless electors,’ says states can require electors to back vote winnersSeattle Times
Supreme Court to debate whether 'faithless electors' can stay in the Electoral CollegeCNN
The Supreme Court will decide if “faithless electors” can ignore the will of the peoplevox.com
What faithless electors are and why they won't matter this yearCNN