DeutschNewstral
Article
wsj.com on 2020-05-13 18:34
‘Faithless Electors’ at the Supreme Court
Related news
The Supreme Court will decide if “faithless electors” can ignore the will of the peoplevox.com
Supreme Court to debate whether 'faithless electors' can stay in the Electoral CollegeCNN
Supreme Court: States Can Punish 'Faithless Electors'; Unanimous Decisionbreitbart.com
Supreme Court may snub ‘faithless’ electorsPOLITICO
U.S. Supreme Court rules against Washington ‘faithless electors,’ says states can require electors to back vote winnersSeattle Times
Court questions sides on 'faithless electors'Arkansas Online
The Supreme Court Isn’t Eager to Let Faithless Electors Blow Up the 2020 Electionslate.com
Colorado’s “faithless electors” request to U.S. Supreme Court gets supportDenver Post- Colorado tells Supreme Court that faithless electors threaten “stable governance”Denver Post
- Supreme Court unanimously sides with Colorado in faithless electors caseDenver Post
- States can punish 'faithless' electors, Supreme Court rulesPOLITICO
Supreme Court hears Colorado's 'faithless electors' case, by phonecsindy.com
Supreme Court rules states can sanction or remove ‘faithless' presidential electorsFox News- Court: Removing 'faithless' electors may be unconstitutionalPOLITICO
- U.S. Supreme Court to consider Washington’s 2016 ‘faithless electors,’ who refused to vote for Hillary ClintonSeattle Times
Supreme Court: “Faithless electors” can be fined $1,000 - Thu, 23 May 2019 PSTThe Spokesman-Review- U.S. Supreme Court seems skeptical of Washington’s ‘faithless electors;’ ruling expected by end of JuneSeattle Times
- Electoral College: Court sides with faithless electorscsindy.com