DeutschNewstral
Article
San Jose Mercury News on 2020-02-04 06:11
Editorial: Fremont voters should back school parcel tax Measure L
Related news
- Fremont voters to weigh Measure L, $296 school district parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
Fremont voters approve $20 parcel tax increase for schoolseastbaytimes.com- Editorial: Vote yes on Fremont Union High School parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Fremont property owners to pay extra $20 parcel tax for schools after Measure I's passageeastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Castro Valley voters should back new school parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Piedmont voters should extend the city’s parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: No on Piedmont, Oakley parcel taxes; Yes on Fremont, Clayton measures (East Bay Times)eastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Franklin-McKinley voters should back parcel tax Measure KSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Voters should pass Foothill-DeAnza bond measure, parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Voters should back Evergreen Elementary District Measure VSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Why Sunnyvale voters should pass Measure BSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Franklin-McKinley voters should back Measure RSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Why Berryessa voters should approve Measure USan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Oakland voters should reject premature school bond measureSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Berkeley voters should reject costly, ill-conceived Measure LSan Jose Mercury News
Fremont voters elect new mayorThe Toledo Blade- Editorial: Support Emeryville’s Measure F sales tax increaseSan Jose Mercury News
- CFremont sells 7-acre parcel for $22 millioncontracostatimes.com
Dublin voters pass Measure Epleasantonweekly.com- Fremont voters approve school construction bondThe Toledo Blade