Newstral
Article
San Jose Mercury News on 2020-02-19 06:10
Editorial: Piedmont voters should extend the city’s parcel tax
Related news
- Editorial: Castro Valley voters should back new school parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Fremont voters should back school parcel tax Measure LSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Piedmont voters should reject increase to record taxSan Jose Mercury News
- CPiedmont: Parcel taxes will rise slightlycontracostatimes.com
- CPiedmont: School parcel tax rising 2%contracostatimes.com
- Piedmont: City’s design awards to honor homeownerseastbaytimes.com
- Opinion: Piedmont schools, city’s funding disparity unfaireastbaytimes.com
- In brief: Piedmont names Putzer city’s new recreation directoreastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Moraga school officials trying to bypass future votersSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Danville voters should back Magee Ranch developmentSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: East Bay voters should reelect state Sen. Steve GlazerSan Jose Mercury News
- Piedmont police chief: City’s 2020 property crimes way upeastbaytimes.com
- Piedmont council unveils city’s revamped website at meetingeastbaytimes.com
- Piedmont police chief reflects on city’s latest crime reporteastbaytimes.com
- Montclair/Piedmont letters: Schaaf should worry more about taxpayers, voterseastbaytimes.com
- In brief: Piedmont Women Voters League meeting May 10eastbaytimes.com
- Piedmont voters approve renewal of City Services Tax Measure Feastbaytimes.com
- CPiedmont: League of Women Voters president keeps focus currentcontracostatimes.com
- In brief: Piedmont Women Voters to host polling literacy eventeastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Franklin-McKinley voters should back parcel tax Measure KSan Jose Mercury News