DeutschNewstral
Article
POLITICO on 2020-07-06 16:17
States can punish 'faithless' electors, Supreme Court rules
Related news
Supreme Court: States Can Punish 'Faithless Electors'; Unanimous Decisionbreitbart.com
Supreme Court rules states can punish 'faithless' presidential electorspost-gazette.com- States can punish 'faithless' electors, Supreme Court rulesPOLITICO
Supreme Court rules states can sanction or remove ‘faithless' presidential electorsFox News
Supreme Court Rules States May Curb 'Faithless Electors' in Electoral CollegeThe New York Times
U.S. Supreme Court rules against Washington ‘faithless electors,’ says states can require electors to back vote winnersSeattle Times
Supreme Court Holds That States May Punish “Faithless Electors”Forbes- States May Curb ‘Faithless Electors,’ Supreme Court RulesThe New York Times
Supreme Court rules states can bind 'faithless electors'CNN- Supreme Court may snub ‘faithless’ electorsPOLITICO
- MSupreme Court rules against 'faithless electors'marketwatch.com
‘Faithless Electors’ at the Supreme Courtwsj.com
States can bind presidential electors’ votes, Supreme Court rulesreviewjournal.com
Supreme Court rules states can bind presidential electors' votesThe Day
Supreme Court hears Colorado's 'faithless electors' case, by phonecsindy.com
Supreme Court rules that states can bind the votes of presidential electorsAlaska Dispatch News- Supreme Court to debate whether 'faithless electors' can stay in the Electoral CollegeCNN
- ‘Faithless Electors’ Could Tip the 2020 Election. Will the Supreme Court Stop Them?The New York Times
Supreme Court: “Faithless electors” can be fined $1,000 - Thu, 23 May 2019 PSTThe Spokesman-Review- U.S. Supreme Court seems skeptical of Washington’s ‘faithless electors;’ ruling expected by end of JuneSeattle Times