DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2020-10-30 19:37
Even When Civil Penalties Are Sought, Unfair Competition and False Advertising Claims Remain Equitable and Will Not Be Tried by a Jury
Related news
- California: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
- No Right to Jury Trial for Unfair Competition or False Advertising Claims in Californiajdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Decides Unfair Competition Claims for Civil Penalties Should Be Tried by a Court Rather Than a Juryjdsupra.com
California taxis sue Uber, allege false advertising, unfair competitionLA Times
Amazon settles claims of false advertising, unfair competition for $2Mmv-voice.com- California Supreme Court Rules That There Is No Right To A Jury Trial For Claims Brought Under California’s Unfair Competition Law And False Advertising Lawjdsupra.com
- Competitors Push Back With False Advertising Lawsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
- California federal judge certifies unfair competition and false advertising class action against Barillajdsupra.com
- Los Angeles County Sues Grubhub for Unfair Business Practices and False Advertisingjdsupra.com
PetSmart agrees to pay $1.46M for overcharging, false advertising, unfair competitionpleasantonweekly.com- California: No Jury Trials in Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law Cases (and Proposition 65 Cases?)jdsupra.com
- Appellate court upholds $21 million judgment against for-profit college regarding unfair competition and false advertising claimsjdsupra.com
- DOJ Doubles Penalties for Violation of the False Claims Actjdsupra.com
- False Advertising Bombs and Firecrackersjdsupra.com
- Avoiding False Advertising Claims During COVID-19jdsupra.com
- New False Advertising Lawsuits: Cows and Cornjdsupra.com
- Novartis Sues Janssen Over Tremfya® False Advertisingjdsupra.com