DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2020-07-09 16:36
No Right to Jury Trial for Unfair Competition or False Advertising Claims in California
Related news
- California: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Rules That There Is No Right To A Jury Trial For Claims Brought Under California’s Unfair Competition Law And False Advertising Lawjdsupra.com
- Even When Civil Penalties Are Sought, Unfair Competition and False Advertising Claims Remain Equitable and Will Not Be Tried by a Juryjdsupra.com
- California: No Jury Trials in Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law Cases (and Proposition 65 Cases?)jdsupra.com
California taxis sue Uber, allege false advertising, unfair competitionLA Times
Amazon settles claims of false advertising, unfair competition for $2Mmv-voice.com- California federal judge certifies unfair competition and false advertising class action against Barillajdsupra.com
PetSmart agrees to pay $1.46M for overcharging, false advertising, unfair competitionpleasantonweekly.com- California Supreme Court Decides Unfair Competition Claims for Civil Penalties Should Be Tried by a Court Rather Than a Juryjdsupra.com
- Appellate court upholds $21 million judgment against for-profit college regarding unfair competition and false advertising claimsjdsupra.com
- Competitors Push Back With False Advertising Lawsjdsupra.com
- The Lanham Act: False Advertising and Unfair Competition Claims Explainedjdsupra.com
- Los Angeles County Sues Grubhub for Unfair Business Practices and False Advertisingjdsupra.com
- Unfair Competition in the Wine Industryjdsupra.com
- Eleventh Circuit Finds Exclusion Bars Trademark Infringement And Dependent False Designation And Unfair Competition Claimsjdsupra.com