DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2023-10-16 22:35
The Lanham Act: False Advertising and Unfair Competition Claims Explained
Related news
- Insurer Has Duty to Defend Lanham Act “False Advertising” Claims Despite False Advertising and Trademark Exclusionsjdsupra.com
- Lanham Act False Advertising Claims Not Precluded by “False Advertising” or “Trademark Infringement” Exclusionsjdsupra.com
- POM Wonderful Returns – Lanham Act False Advertising Claim Against Home Pregnancy Tests Not Precluded by FDCAjdsupra.com
- Judge Sleet Denies SurgiQuest’s JMOL Motion After Finding Evidence Was Sufficient To Support Jury’s Verdict Of False Advertising And Unfair Competitionjdsupra.com
- District Of Delaware Grants Defendant’s Motion To Exclude Plaintiff Damages Expert’s Testimony In False Advertising Action Under The Lanham Actjdsupra.com
- A King, a Knight, and a Wizard Walk Into the Bar: A Tale of False Advertising Under the Lanham Actjdsupra.com
California taxis sue Uber, allege false advertising, unfair competitioninsidebayarea.com
Amazon settles claims of false advertising, unfair competition for $2Mmv-voice.com- Judge Connolly Denies Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment On Plaintiff’s False Advertising Claims Under The Lanham Act And Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Actjdsupra.com
- Judge Connolly Adopts The Recommendations Of Magistrate Judge Burke To Deny Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Lanham Act And Unfair Competition Claimsjdsupra.com
- Judge Noreika Grants Defendant’s Post-Trial Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Reversing the Jury’s Finding of Liability for False Advertising under the Lanham Act and Award of Punitive Damages Against Defendantjdsupra.com
- California: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
- No Right to Jury Trial for Unfair Competition or False Advertising Claims in Californiajdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court: No Right to Jury in Unfair Competition, False Advertising Casesjdsupra.com
PetSmart agrees to pay $1.46M for overcharging, false advertising, unfair competitionpleasantonweekly.com- Appellate court upholds $21 million judgment against for-profit college regarding unfair competition and false advertising claimsjdsupra.com