Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2015-07-15 16:30
Fourth District Expounds On CEQA’s Responses To Comments Rules – And Abuses of the Process – As Well As Other Issues In Upholding Supplemental EIR For Expanded Orange County Jail Facility
Related news
- Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding State Lands Commission’s Supplemental EIR For Desalination Plant Lease Modification, Rejects CEQA Claims That Commission Piecemealed Review And Should Have Assumed Lead Agency Status And Prepared A Subsequent EIRjdsupra.com
- Poseidon’s Desalination Plant’s Supplemental EIR Holds Water According to the Court of Appealjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Addresses CEQA Baseline Issues In Partially Published Opinion Upholding EIR For Carlsbad Shopping Mall Renovationjdsupra.com
- Undisclosed Change in Building Height Requires Supplemental EIRjdsupra.com
- Sixth District Belatedly Orders Published Its Opinion Upholding Constitutionality Of Judicial Council’s Emergency Rule Altering CEQA’s Statutes Of Limitationsjdsupra.com
- Flunking CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Test: Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding MND for El Dorado County Bridge Replacement Project, Rejects Arguments Based on Alleged Significant Impacts on Fire Evacuation Routes During Construction As Insufficient To Require EIRjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Belatedly Publishes CEQA Opinion Upholding City of Newport Beach’s Approval of Multifamily-Housing Development Pursuant To Addendum To 2006 EIR For Larger Mixed-Use Developmentjdsupra.com
- Sixth District Applies CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Standard, Holds That Despite Project’s Compliance With Local Noise Ordinance, EIR Rather Than Mitigated Negative Declaration Is Required Based On Factual, Non-Expert Evidence Of Noise And Traffic Safety Impactsjdsupra.com
- PlanCo Takes Up Aquafarms' EIRnorthcoastjournal.com
- Supplemental EIR For Beverly Hilton Project Submitted For Public Commentbhcourier.com
- CEQA Remedies Go Both Ways: Fourth District Reverses Judgment Upholding San Diego County Board’s Decision Granting Project Opponents’ Administrative Appeal, Holds Board Erred In Finding CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Statutory Exemption Inapplicable And Ordering EIR Prepared for Exempt Industrial Projectjdsupra.com
- CAlbany EIR challenge rejected by appeals courtcontracostatimes.com
- California Supreme Court Strengthens CEQA’s Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Demand for an EIRnorthcoastjournal.com
- BMore Reasons Why the Harold Way Project EIR is Inadequateberkeleydailyplanet.com
- Upholding free speechArkansas Online
- The Other CEQA Shoe Drops: Third District Reverses Judgment Upholding Siskiyou County’s EIR For Crystal Geyser Bottling Plant Project, Holds (1) Project Objectives Were Too Narrowly Stated And (2) County Should Have Recirculated EIR’s Climate Discussion To Allow Comment On Substantially Higher GHG Emissions Estimate First Disclosed In FEIRjdsupra.com
- How CEQA’s Administrative Record Preparation Process Could Be Reformed By Eliminating CEQA Petitioners’ Statutory Option To Prepare The Recordjdsupra.com
- Sixth District Upholds Constitutionality of Judicial Council’s Covid Emergency Rules Altering CEQA’s Statutes of Limitations In Unpublished Opinionjdsupra.com
- Beverly Hills News – Planning Commission to Review Draft Supplemental EIR for One Beverly Hillsbhcourier.com