Newstral
Article
San Jose Mercury News on 2019-10-12 08:10
Editorial: Piedmont voters should reject increase to record tax
Related news
- Editorial: Reject Piedmont property tax hike for pool repairsSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Piedmont voters should extend the city’s parcel taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Alameda County voters narrowly reject sales tax increaseeastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Oakland voters should reject premature school bond measureSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Santa Clara voters should approve hotel tax increaseSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Why San Jose voters should reject cardrooms tax increaseSan Jose Mercury News
- Piedmont voters approve renewal of City Services Tax Measure Feastbaytimes.com
- Editorial: Berkeley voters should reject costly, ill-conceived Measure LSan Jose Mercury News
- Jonesboro voters reject sales tax increasenwaonline.com
- Hancock County voters reject sales tax increaseThe Toledo Blade
- CMy Word: Piedmont allowing school tax exemptions inexplicable, costlycontracostatimes.com
- Editorial: Reject Alameda County record-shattering sales tax hikeSan Jose Mercury News
- CPiedmont: Council OKs tax measure for June ballotcontracostatimes.com
- Editorial: Newark voters should reelect Mayor Nagy, renew utility taxSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Fremont voters should back school parcel tax Measure LSan Jose Mercury News
- Editorial: Support Emeryville’s Measure F sales tax increaseSan Jose Mercury News
- Polk County voters narrowly reject sales tax increasekcci.com
- Dardanelle voters reject 8-mill property tax increaseArkansas Online
- Devils Lake voters approve 1 tax increase, reject anotherseattletimes.com
- Jackson Co. voters reject 1-cent sales tax increasewaff.com