Newstral
Article
sacbee.com on 2022-10-09 14:00
Proposition 30: Should California tax the rich to pay for electric cars, wildfire protection?
Related news
- Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric carsThe Economist
- Proposition 70: High-speed rail or electric cars? How should California spend billions from its climate program?San Jose Mercury News
- Proposition 30, California ‘millionaires’ tax for electric vehicles, still up in the airsacbee.com
- SElectric cars are California’s futuresundial.csun.edu
- Are Electric Cars Only for the Rich? Sacramento Is Challenging That NotionThe New York Times
- TElectric Cars Are Not “Zero-Emission Vehicles”thefloridastar.com
- Flogging smog: California to mandate electric cars by 2035New York Post
- Proposition 30, wealth tax for electric vehicle subsidies, appears headed for defeatLA Times
- Lawmakers fail to approve wildfire protection money, help for California insurance crisissacbee.com
- Steve Forbes: Rich people don't need your money to buy electric cars -- Let's get real about EV tax creditsFox News
- Judge could force PG&E to inspect all 106,000 miles of electric grid before wildfire seasonsacbee.com
- MSan Luis Obispo to celebrate electric cars this weekmustangnews.net
- Pols who push electric cars ignore basic math and physicsNew York Post
- Wildfire burns cars on highwayReuters
- Wildfire engulfs cars on freewayCNN
- Letters: Protect public health | COVID gains | Electric cars | Unfinished businessSan Jose Mercury News
- Rebate plan unveiled to push more charging stations for electric cars in San Diego Countysandiegouniontribune.com
- N‘Like a bad dream’: Rich and famous among mass evacuations as wildfire approaches Los Angelesnationalpost.com